The Industrial Relations Code, 2020 (IRC) is one of the four labor codes introduced by the Indian government to consolidate and simplify existing labor laws. It subsumes three major legislations:
1. The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
2. The Trade Unions Act, 1926
3. The Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946
The IRC aims to promote industrial harmony, streamline dispute resolution mechanisms, and balance the interests of employers and workers. Below is a detailed classification of labor and industrial laws as structured under this code.
Classification of Labor and Industrial Laws
A. Regulation of Trade Unions
• The IRC lays down provisions related to the registration, recognition, and functioning of trade unions.
• Registration of Trade Unions (Chapter III): Under Section 4, a trade union must have at least 10% or 100 workers, whichever is less, as members for registration.
• Recognition of Trade Unions (Section 14): For an industrial establishment with more than 300 workers, the code introduces the concept of a “negotiating union,” which must represent 51% of workers.
Case Law: Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. A. Rajappa (1978) emphasized the broad interpretation of “industry,” reinforcing the role of trade unions in dispute resolution.
B. Standing Orders
• The provisions under the IRC regulate conditions of service in industrial establishments.
• Applicability: Standing orders apply to industrial establishments with 300 or more workers (Section 28).
• Flexibility for Employers: Employers are allowed to modify standing orders after consultation with the workers’ representative.
C. Industrial Disputes
• The IRC provides a streamlined mechanism for dispute resolution, covering strikes, lockouts, layoffs, retrenchments, and closures.
• Strikes and Lockouts (Section 62-63): Workers in public utility services must provide 14 days’ notice before a strike. Strikes during conciliation or adjudication proceedings are prohibited.
• Layoffs and Retrenchments (Section 77-78): Establishments employing 300 or more workers must seek prior government approval for layoffs, retrenchments, or closures.
• Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: Disputes can be resolved through conciliation, arbitration, or adjudication (Chapter IV).
Case Law: In Punjab Land Development and Reclamation Corporation v. Presiding Officer (1990), the Supreme Court upheld retrenchment compensation as a worker’s right under similar provisions in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
Important Features of the IRC
A. Classification Based on Worker Type
The code defines different categories of workers and their rights:
• Permanent Workers: Entitled to social security benefits and protection from arbitrary dismissal.
• Fixed-Term Workers: Granted the same benefits as permanent workers, ensuring equitable treatment.
• Contractual Workers: Specific provisions ensure their wages and working conditions are regulated.
B. Classification Based on Establishment Size
The IRC introduces thresholds for applicability:
• Establishments with less than 300 workers: Relaxed norms for standing orders and retrenchments.
• Establishments with 300 or more workers: More stringent requirements, including prior government approval for layoffs.
C. Simplified Definitions
• The IRC consolidates and redefines terms such as “industry,” “worker,” and “wages,” ensuring clarity and reducing litigation.
• Definition of Worker (Section 2(zq)): Excludes managerial and administrative employees earning more than a specified threshold.
• Definition of Industry: Follows the broad interpretation from the Bangalore Water Supply case.
Impact of the IRC on Industrial Relations
A. Pro-Worker Provisions
• Increased representation through the negotiating union.
• Benefits of fixed-term employment without discrimination.
• Streamlined grievance redressal mechanisms.
B. Employer-Friendly Provisions
• Flexibility in modifying standing orders.
• Reduced compliance burden for small establishments.
• Clear guidelines for strikes and lockouts to ensure industrial peace.
Relevant Case Laws
- Workmen of Dimakuchi Tea Estate v. Dimakuchi Tea Estate (1958): This case clarified the scope of “industrial dispute,” which forms the basis for resolving disputes under the IRC.
- Gujarat Mazdoor Sabha v. State of Gujarat (2020): The Supreme Court scrutinized state amendments in labor laws, highlighting the importance of balancing worker rights and employer interests.
- Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. V. Workmen (1967): Reinforced the principles of natural justice in cases of retrenchment, which are now codified under the IRC.
Criticisms and Suggestions for Improvement
A. Criticisms
• Lack of Clarity on Dispute Resolution: The overlapping jurisdiction of conciliation officers and industrial tribunals can delay outcomes.
• Increased Threshold for Applicability: Raising the threshold for standing orders and retrenchment provisions to 300 workers may exclude many establishments.
B. Suggestions
• Introducing stricter timelines for dispute resolution.
• Extending certain protections to smaller establishments.
Conclusion
The Industrial Relations Code, 2020, marks a significant step in modernizing labor laws in India. Its streamlined provisions for trade unions, standing orders, and dispute resolution mechanisms aim to foster industrial harmony. However, its implementation must be backed by robust administrative mechanisms and a balance between worker rights and employer flexibility. Judicial interpretation will play a pivotal role in shaping its practical application.
.png)
.png)
.png)
